← All projects

01 / Mechanisms / Mechanical design

Flapping-Wing Ornithopter

Development of a compact, multi-segment flapping-wing mechanism designed for synchronized actuation, glide capability, and wind-tunnel testing.

Status
In Progress
Role
Design Lead / Mechanical Design
Project type
Senior Mechanical Engineering Capstone
Tools & methods
SolidWorks · Mechanism Design · Kinematic Analysis · Python · Tolerance Planning · Manufacturing Planning
Current SolidWorks assembly of the multi-segment flapping-wing ornithopter, showing the synchronized drivetrain, articulated wing segments, spars, and airfoil geometry.
Current CAD iteration of the synchronized multi-segment flapping-wing mechanism.

THE CHALLENGE

The engineering problem.

Develop a compact flapping-wing system that converts continuous motor rotation into synchronized, bird-like wing motion within a 12-inch total wingspan. The mechanism must coordinate multiple articulated segments, accommodate a future glide-lock mode, remain manufacturable, and support planned wind-tunnel testing.

MY ROLE

What I owned.

  • Led mechanical wing architecture development and successive SolidWorks CAD iterations.
  • Designed the crank-linkage and geared drivetrain for synchronized oscillatory wing motion.
  • Developed inner-to-outer wing geometry while evaluating packaging, interference, span, and clearances.
  • Built a custom kinematic-analysis tool to evaluate linkage dimensions and flapping behavior before fabrication.
  • Contributed to airfoil integration, material selection, tolerance planning, and manufacturing decisions.

DESIGN & DEVELOPMENT

Engineering process.

PROCESS / 01 — Concept Development

From independent actuation to a mechanically synchronized system

Early concepts explored gearing at the wing joints and separate brushless and servo-and-pulley actuation for the inner and outer segments. Gear loading, added mass, and the complexity of coordinating multiple actuators motivated a simpler architecture.

The design evolved toward a single motor with mechanically coupled wings. A crank-linkage system converts rotation into oscillatory motion, while spars transmit motion to the outer segments for synchronous left-right flapping.

Preliminary ornithopter proof-of-concept CAD showing the early multi-segment wing architecture and linkage-driven flapping concept.
Preliminary proof-of-concept CAD, before final airfoil geometry, manufacturing clearances, and tolerances were incorporated.

PROCESS / 02 — Drivetrain & Synchronous Flapping

Converting rotary input into coordinated wing motion

The current drivetrain uses paired gears and crank links to convert continuous motor rotation into reciprocating wing motion. Mechanical coupling synchronizes both wings without independent actuator control.

Linkage geometry determines flapping amplitude and motion through the wing structure. Gear placement, crank geometry, joint locations, and packaging are central to the design.

Close-up SolidWorks view of the paired gears, crank links, and linkage joints used to synchronize the left and right wing motion.
Current gear pair and crank-linkage architecture for synchronous flapping.

PROCESS / 03 — Kinematic Analysis

Evaluating the mechanism before fabrication

I developed a custom mechanism-analysis tool to evaluate linkage geometry before committing to hardware. It simulates a complete crank rotation and allows geometric parameters to be adjusted while monitoring motion and packaging constraints.

Candidate geometries can be checked for wing travel, maximum span, joint clearance, and linkage interference. This supports faster dimensional iteration before rebuilding the complete CAD assembly or fabricating parts.

Custom Python linkage-analysis tool showing the ornithopter mechanism geometry, crank position, span boundaries, linkage clearances, and interference checks.
Current kinematic-analysis interface for evaluating geometry and clearance through the flapping cycle.

PROCESS / 04 — Wing Geometry & Airfoil Integration

Adapting an aerodynamic profile to an articulated wing

NACA 4415 is the selected baseline structural and aerodynamic profile for investigating a segmented flapping-wing architecture.

An extended trailing region draws inspiration from bird-wing feathers. Integrating this shape requires balancing spar placement, joint packaging, manufacturability, and total span.

SolidWorks cross-section of the current NACA 4415-inspired wing profile with an extended trailing region intended to support the bird-like wing concept.
Current NACA 4415-based section with an extended trailing feature.

PROCESS / 05 — Packaging & Manufacturing

Designing inside a tightly constrained envelope

The 12-inch total wingspan constrains linkage placement, spar routing, joint geometry, and drivetrain packaging. CAD iterations focus on interference, shaft and joint clearances, structural support, and manufacturable geometry.

The material and process plan combines lightweight wing structures, carbon-fiber spars, additively manufactured joints and mechanism components, and laser-cut parts where appropriate. Fabrication will begin after geometry, clearance, and tolerance reviews are finalized.

Current SolidWorks wing assembly illustrating articulated wing geometry and structural packaging within the planned wingspan.
Current wing CAD supporting packaging and manufacturing planning.

DESIGN EVOLUTION

Reducing complexity through mechanical synchronization

01 / Early concept

Joint-Mounted Gearing

Gears at the articulated joints offered direct segment control, but potential gear loading, added weight, and mechanical complexity made this approach less attractive.

02 / Intermediate concept

Independent Brushless + Servo Actuation

Brushless inner-wing actuation and servo-driven outer wings offered independent control. Synchronizing multiple actuators increased control and packaging complexity.

03 / Current approach

Single Mechanically Coupled Drivetrain

One primary drivetrain produces bilateral flapping and transmits motion through spars and linkages, making synchronization a mechanical property of the system.

TECHNICAL HIGHLIGHTS

Current design targets

Maximum Wingspan

12 in

Wing Architecture

2 segments per side

Target Flapping Rate

4–8 Hz

Nominal design point: 6 Hz

Baseline Airfoil

NACA 4415

Actuation

Mechanically synchronized drivetrain

ANALYSIS & VALIDATION

Design validation before hardware

Preliminary CFD work has established an analysis workflow around NACA 4415. The custom linkage tool and CAD interference checks evaluate motion and physical clearances across the flapping cycle.

Physical testing is planned and has not occurred. After fabrication, the mechanism is intended for campus wind-tunnel testing with controlled airspeed and angle-of-attack sweeps, comparing recorded aerodynamic and mechanism-response data with the analysis workflow.

CURRENT STATUS

Detailed design in progress

The flapping architecture, synchronized drivetrain concept, segmented wing layout, and baseline airfoil geometry are established. Linkage dimensions, tolerances, joint geometry, and component packaging are being refined.

Physical parts have not yet been ordered or assembled. Fabrication, bench testing, and wind-tunnel validation remain future work.

  1. Finalize linkage geometry and interference checks.
  2. Complete tolerance and manufacturing review.
  3. Freeze CAD.
  4. Fabricate and assemble the mechanism.
  5. Bench-test synchronized flapping.
  6. Conduct wind-tunnel testing.